![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
transportable
fuels |
|
Transportable fuels
is the seventh of a series of briefing documents on
the problems of power consumption, posed by the steady depletion of fossil
fuels and most particularly of pumpable oil. One of a grouping of documents on global concerns at abelard.org. |
|
1 Replacing
fossil fuels—the scale of the problem 2 Nuclear power - is nuclear power really really dangerous? 3 Replacements for fossil fuels—what can be done about it? 4 Global warming 5 Energy economics—how long do we have? 6 Ionising radiation and health—risk analysis 7 Transportable fuels 8 Distributed energy systems and micro-generation |
sustainable futures briefing documents |
Index
|
|
Introduction
I am no vehicle mechanic, car buff or physicist. My interest is confined to the fossil fuel problems. This briefing document is only intended to orient you, the reader, and give some idea where to look for further exploration of these topics if you so wish. |
|
|
For formation of methanol from electricity, air and water (pdf file). Howstuffworks.com is a useful site providing information and diagrams, such
as the next two links. Gasoline, or petrol, is an aliphatic hydrocarbon. That is, it is made up of molecules composed of only hydrogen and carbon, which are arranged in chains. Gasoline/petrol molecules have from seven to 11 carbons in each chain. Note that with less carbon (and hydrogen) in the chain, the molecule is lighter. With from one to four carbon atoms, the aliphatic hydrocarbon is a gas – methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6), propane (C3H8) and butane (C4H10). With from five to 18 carbon atoms, the molecule is a liquid; while with 19 or over carbon atoms, the molecules are all solids at room temperature. |
||
H H H H H H H | | | | | | | H-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-H Heptane [7] | | | | | | | H H H H H H H |
H H H H H H H H H | | | | | | | | | H-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-H Nonane [9] | | | | | | | | | H H H H H H H H H |
advertising disclaimer |
H H H H H H H
H | | | | | | | | H-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-H Octane [8] | | | | | | | | H H H H H H H H |
|
|
DiscussionHybrid-engined vehicles are starting to flow onto the market. These vehicles are up to a couple of thousand dollars more expensive than petrol-engined vehicles. Diesel vehicles are, similarly, more expensive than hybrids. Diesels are well established in Europe and, currently, give similar consumption performance, but they are rare in the USA. The situation becomes confused because there are all sorts of subsidies and goverment interference in the market of the vehicle, fuel and road-building sectors. For example, the USA is currently giving vast subsidies to heavy SUVs (sports utility vehicles). Smaller subsidies are available in California for hybrids. (This item on fuel consumptions includes links to tax breaks for SUVs and hybrids.) In the UK, approximately three-quarters of the fuel price is government tax, and diesel prices are maintained at the same level as petrol prices. On the European continent, diesel fuel prices are 20 + % lower than petrol ones, but any fuel saving is heavily offset by considerable tolls on motorways. It is probable that a diesel or hybrid vehicle will not do more than recover, in fuel savings, the excess expenditure over the vehicle's lifetime.[1] Government priorities tend to be to maximise tax revenue and appeasing their corporate clients, with no great concern for environment and efficiency. It is necessary to keep in mind that hybrid cars are more complicated and require heavy battery packs. Part of any assessment of a vehicle’s ecology credentials would have to include the energy and materials involved in its production. It is important to realise that lowering the weight of a vehicle also lowers the required size of the engine. This lowers the car’s weight still further—a virtuous feedback. Because hybrids can use their electric motors to assist immediate acceleration, the main drive unit may be smaller. Hybrids have the potential to generate less pollution; as also do diesels
just by virtue of their lower fuel consumption. While there are particulate
concerns with diesel, modern diesel engines and fuels are reducing these problems
considerably. |
Comparison
of miles per imp. gallon, miles per US gallon, miles per litre |
miles per (km per) – UK-oriented table | ||
imperial (UK) gallon | US gallon | litre | |
Dodge Ram SRT-10 > | 10 (16) | 8.33 (13.13) | 2.20 (3.52) |
20 (32) | 16.67 (26.67) | 4.40 (7.04) | |
30 (48) | 25.00 (40.00) | 6.60 (10.56) | |
40 (64) | 33.33 (53.33) | 8.80 (14.08) | |
Toyota Echo (petrol) > | 50 (80) | 41.67 (66.67) | 11.00 (17.60) |
Toyota P || Honda C || VW (diesel) > | 60 (96) | 50.00 (80.00) | 13.20 (21.12) |
70 (112) | 58.33 ( 93.33) | 15.40 ( 24.64 ) | |
Honda Insight > | 80 (128) | 66.67 (106.67) | 17.60 ( 28.16 ) |
Comparison
of miles per imp. gallon, miles per US gallon, miles per litre |
|||
miles per (km per) – US-oriented table | |||
imperial (UK) gallon | US gallon | litre | |
Dodge Ram SRT-10 > | 12.05 (19.28) | 10 (16) | 2.65 (4.24) |
24.10 (38.55) | 20 (32) | 5.30 (8.48) | |
36.14 (57.83) | 30 (48) | 7.95 (12.72) | |
Toyota Echo (petrol) > | 48.19 (77.11) | 40 (64) | 10.60 (16.96) |
Toyota P || Honda C || VW(diesel) > | 60.24 (96.39) | 50 (80) | 13.25 (21.20) |
Honda Insight > | 72.29 (115.66) | 60 (96) | 15.90 (25.44) |
84.34 (134.94) | 70 (112) | 18..55 (29.68) |
| Top-rated road vehicle fuel consumptions in the USA, 2003 | ||
Honda Insight | 64 miles per US gallon | |
Toyota Prius | 48 mpg (US) | |
Honda Civic Hybrid | 48 mpg (US) | |
Volkswagen TDI | 45 mpg (US) | (diesel engine) |
Toyota Echo | 38 mpg (US) | (petrol engine) |
US
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rating, combined highway and city figures |
Conversion table | imperial (UK) gallon | US gallon | litre | ![]() |
imperial (UK) gallon |
1 | 1.2 | 4.546 | |
US gallon | 0.83 | 1 | 3.785 | |
litre | 0.22 | 0.26 | 1 | |
|
dodge city – is the USA quite mad?the public relations message from DaimlerChrysler
The letters SRT stand for Street and Racing Technology.
|
advertising disclaimer |
This is how DiamlerChrysler introduces their new model:
Fuel consumption tests are performed in the USA by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [2]. Typically, such tests are negociated between government and major interests like the oil and vehicle lobbies.You will notice that these fuel consumption tests are deliberately designed to minimise and underplay fuel consumption in normal driving. The official line is that the tests are meant only to be used for comparing different vehicle consumptions. There is no mention of 70 mph highway/motorway driving or any other high fuel consumption activity, let alone going at 155 mph in a truck. For this last, the observer would wonder how many gallons to the mile was being burnt up.
As you will see, here is an ordinary driver ending up with two-thirds, going on a half, the number of miles per gallon that the EPA figures would have led them to believe. Put this ludicrous Dodge truck into the hands of the sort of boy racer who would crave such a vehicle and you might wonder what chance of driving five miles to a US gallon. So much for DaimlerChrysler’s “conservational approach towards resources”. |
latest | abstracts | briefings | information | headlines | resources | interesting | about abelard |
|
You are here: 7 transportable fuels < Briefings documents < Home |
© abelard, 2004, 04 march the address for this document is http://www.abelard.org/briefings/transportable-fuel.asp x words |