|
| Course | Speech Perception and Production | |
| Vakcode | TW85441 | |
| Credits | 5 ECTS | |
| Entry requirements | BA Linguistics or something equivalent | |
| Period | semester 1, block 1 (September through October 2011) | |
| Information | Onderwijssecretariaat Taal- en Letterkunde also see IFA teaching also see the page of the study guide | |
| Part of... | Research Master's in Linguistics Master's in General Linguistics Master's in Artifical Intelligence | |
| Teacher | Paul Boersma | |
| Place | BH 302 | |
| Time | Thursday 15:00-17:45 (exact days see below) | |
| Objectives | ||
| Building on knowledge of acoustic and articulatory phonetics that the student has acquired in earlier BA courses, this course aims at providing insight into and knowledge about how listeners organize their perception of speech, how speakers organize their production of speech, how this organization develops in first and second languages, how this development leads to changes over the generations, and how these changes lead to "emergent universals", i.e. observed facts about what occurs and what does not occur in languages worldwide. The student comes to understand the empirical evidence (from experiments described in the literature), comes to understand theoretical explanations (from reviews published in the literature), and acquires the skill of modelling the phenomena within an explicit theory of multi-level bidirectional phonology and phonetics. | ||
| Contents | ||
Attention is paid to the following subjects:
| ||
| Format | ||
| lectures and practical sessions | ||
| Study materials | ||
| We assume you already have prior knowledge of acoustic and articulatory phonetics, such as that provided by Peter Ladefoged's book Vowels and consonants. If not, you should buy that book and read it in the first week. At the end of each lecture, we provide you with an article from the literature on phonetic or psycholinguistic experiments, and/or with an article by ourselves that attempts to model the underlying mechanism of those experiments within our multi-level Optimality-Theoretic framework of bidirectional phonology and phonetics. | ||
| Cost | ||
| about €15 for printing the articles | ||
| Language | ||
| English | ||
Your grade will be a weighted average of your grades for: graded home assignments (57 percent), a small written examination on acoustic phonetics (12 percent), a test on producing some sounds (3 percent), and a test in week 8 (28 percent).
Each of the seven lectures lasts 2.5 hours (plus break). Your homework may cost you about 11 hours a week; this is also true of the homework you receive in the seventh week, on which the final test (in week 8) will be based. This course will therefore cost you about 13.5 hours a week (a third of your time), which makes a total of approximately 105 hours, at least if you succeed on the first try.
A typical lecture is divided into three hours:
In some lectures there could be a test.
The homework is handed in no later than the night before the day before the next lecture, that is about 36 hours before the next lecture. Regarding the work that the teacher has to do, this deadline is an unnegotiable condition.
| Lecture 1 Sept. 8 2011 |
Models of phonological and phonetic comprehension and production; cross-language perception First hour: gaps in your knowledge of speech production, transcription, speech perception, and the ear. Second hour: one model of bidirectional phonology and phonetics. Third hour: application to a simple case from Polivanov (1931), namely tak, to explain how to do OT modelling of perception. Homework: 1. your own static spectral auditory forms. 2. read Polivanov (1931): The subjective nature of the perceptions of language sounds. 3. model Polivanov's case of Japanese cross-language perception of the Russian word drama. |
| Lecture 2 Sept. 15 2011 |
Serial, parallel, and interactive comprehension: the Ganong effect First hour: discussion of assignments 1-3. Second hour: background to reading McQueen & Cutler (1997): voice onset time, perception tasks in the laboratory. Third hour: presentation on the Ganong effect. Homework: 4. your own voice onset time. 5. read McQueen & Cutler (1997): Cognitive processes in speech perception. 6. model the Ganong effect in sequential and parallel OT. |
| Lecture 3 Sept. 22 2011 |
Perceiving vowel spaces First hour: discussion of assignments 4-6. Second hour: presentation on Peterson & Barney (1952: Control methods used in a study of vowels) Third hour: some technical background terms used by that article (dB, mel, standard deviation, statistical significance, analysis of variance). Homework: 7. plot Peterson & Barney's three vowel spaces. 8. plot your own /a-e-i-o-u/ vowel space. 9. devise a cue constraint ranking for your vowels /a-e-i-o-u/. |
| Lecture 4 Sept. 29 2011 |
Lexicon-driven learning of perception; the McGurk effect First hour: discussion of assignments 7-9, including a test on vowels (waveforms, spectrograms, formants, excitation patterns), and on Peterson & Barney's technical background terms (12 percent). Second hour: presentation of Escudero & Boersma's (2001) talk in Philadelphia, on our modelling of the acquisition of cue weighting. Third hour: presentation (and demo) on the McGurk effect and on bidirectionalism. Homework: 10. measure your /a-e-i-o-u/ perception grammar. 11. read Escudero & Boersma (2001/2003): Modelling the perceptual development of phonological contrasts with Optimality Theory and the Gradual Learning Algorithm. 12. ejectives: produce them (3 percent) and order their six gestures. 13. read Boersma (2011): A constraint-based explanation of the McGurk effect. |
| Lecture 5 Oct. 6 2011 |
The perceptual magnet effect: prototypes or perceptual warping? First hour: discussion of assignments 10-13. Second hour: presentation on perceptual magnets, prototypes, and perceptual warping. Third hour: presentation of Boersma/Escudero/Hayes talk at GALA, Utrecht 2003. Homework: 14. read Kuhl (1991): Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. 15. constraints for the perceptual magnet effect or perceptual warping. 16. read Boersma, Escudero & Hayes (2003): Learning abstract phonological from auditory phonetic categories: an integrated model for the acquisition of language-specific sound categories. 17. improve Boersma, Escudero & Hayes (2003). |
| Lecture 6 Oct. 13 2011 |
Using the same constraints for perception and production: the prototype effect First hour: discussion of assignments 14-17. Second hour: presentation on the prototype effect. Third hour: presentation of Boersma's talk on vowel dispersion at GLOW, Tromsø 2007. Homework: 18. read Johnson, Flemming & Wright (1993): The hyperspace effect: phonetic targets are hyperarticulated. 19. read Boersma & Hamann (2008): The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. |
| Lecture 7 Oct. 20 2011 |
Using the same constraints for perception and production: markedness and licensing by cue First hour: discussion of assignments 18-19. Second hour: presentation on the phonology of markedness. Third hour: presentation on the phonology of licensing by cue. Homework: 20. read Liberman, Harris, Hoffman & Griffith (1957): The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. 21. read Boersma & Hamann (2009): Loanword adaptation as first-language phonological perception. |
| Final test Oct. 26 2011 15:00-17:00 BH 302 |
Final test Two hours: a test on homework 20 and 21. |