back to Contents
Institute
of Phonetic Sciences,
University
of Amsterdam,
Proceedings
22 (1998), 21-45
Paul
Boersma
Abstract
Though
seemingly a good candidate for a universal output-oriented constraint, the OCP
does not occur as a constraint in the production grammar. Instead, it handles,
in interaction with the No-Crossing Constraint, the correspondence between
acoustic cues and perceptual feature values in the perception grammar. Because
faithfulness constraints use the perception grammar to evaluate the similarity
between the perceptual specification and the perceptual output in the
production grammar, the OCP does influence the evaluation of candidates in the
production grammar. As a result, adjacent identical elements are avoided
because they constitute PARSE violations. Dissimilation at a distance, by
contrast, is due to a constraint against the repetition of articulatory gestures.
In
this paper and in Boersma 1998a, I point out the advantages of distinguishing
between articulatory and perceptual features in autosegmental phonology.
According to McCarthy
(1988), the only phonological processes that can be accepted as primitives in
autosegmental phonology, are
spreading,
deletion,
and the
obligatory
contour principle
(OCP). While Boersma 1998a centres on spreading, the current paper will tackle
the OCP.
McCarthy
(1986) expresses the Obligatory Contour Principle (OCP) in its naked form as
follows:
“adjacent
identical elements are forbidden”
As
we will see, many phenomena have been ascribed to this principle.
back to Contents